Tea Party Astroturf vs. Grassroots: Does it Really Matter Anymore?

This much is clear: on and around April 15th, conservatives around the nation will hold Tax Day Tea Parties to protest, among other things, President Obama’s wasteful spending, prospective tax hikes on the rich, and other pet issues.  What I’m not so clear on is the battle being waged between liberals and conservatives over the significance and “authenticity” of the protests.

Two basic storylines have emerged.  If the themed Tea Party events are being secretly organized by outfits like Richard Armey’s FreedomWorks and then systematically promoted by FoxNews then they’re “phony” “fake grassroots” and thus have no real legitimacy. But if they rose up without any real central marching orders, spontaneously bursting into life from the depths of #tcot on Twitter, then they’re organic and true, tapping into an as-yet unappreciated populist rage over public spending and higher taxes on millionaires.

Now, obviously, each side of the political spectrum has an interest in promoting their preferred storyline.  Liberals like the idea that a bunch of wealthy lobbyists who really only care about higher tax rates on the rich are trying to fool the (rest of the) media and home viewers into seeing a revolution where none exists.  Conservatives like the idea that there’s an army of pissed off everyday folks who are so sick of seeing Obama spend away our GDP that they’re literally bursting out of their front doors to take to the streets (or the coffeeshops, at least).

The problem is, I can’t really figure out why I’m supposed to care about the difference between these two stories anymore.  The whole debate over what’s authentic and what’s manufactured seems increasingly meaningless: rooted in the thoroughly elitist vision of a few powerbrokers manipulating amassed rubes.  But in this day and age, the “rubes” are mostly fully aware and active participants in the game.

These days, everyone’s meta, everyone is a wanna-be content-creator, everyone “gets” the importance of political organizing and grabbing media attention.  People play along or not with this or that mass event for their own purposes, to help promote what they see as their own causes and opinions.  And whether it’s some lobbyist calling up a donor list to get people to organize national events, Glen Beck bloviating from above, or if people are simply calling each other up out of the blue, we’re still talking about what is essentially some swath of willing conservatives putting on a show of power for the rest of us.  Hoping for more coverage of their arguments and concerns.  Liberals can certainly accuse these concerns of being misguided or hypocritical.  But I don’t see any dupes amongst the Tea Partiers, or any real lack of sincerity, for that matter.

In the end, the success or failure of things like Tea Party events rests almost entirely on the sheer number of bodies that show up and get involved.  The question of exactly how they’ve been organizing is a fascinating one, but it really doesn’t alter the final equation in terms of either real activist passion or effective political power.  “Authenticity,” as a measure, seems almost meaningless.  Every participant is a “Man-Behind-the-Curtain” in this sort of modern production.

Of course, the really oddity here is that actual, concrete public opinion and outrage is pretty easy to measure these days. Polls may not be perfect instruments, particularly when the questions aren’t well phrased.  But they’re usually close enough for broad generalizations about the overall direction and patience of the voting public.  That means that anyone who’s honestly interested in the number of people who oppose Obama’s spending plans can find out fairly easily.  And the media’s hand-wringing attempts to discern what the public really thinks, especially by the roundabout means of covering and analyzing these sorts of message events, seem a little pointless and overwrought.

Advertisements

~ by Drew on 2009/04/13.

3 Responses to “Tea Party Astroturf vs. Grassroots: Does it Really Matter Anymore?”

  1. […] on both the right and the left, Reynolds also weighs into the alleged authenticity issue, which as I’ve noted previously, seems like sort of a pointless matter these days, signifying nothing no matter which side is […]

  2. I’m basing my opinion solely on the photographs and video I’ve seen of these events. It seems to me that the number of anti-gay and anti-abortion posters rivals the number of anti-tax and anti-spending posters. Is it wrong for me to wonder if these rallies are truly attended by people united under one common cause? It seems to me that this is just another come-one-come-all “conservative” nutfest. I agree that the numbers are more important than the organization, but the most important thing to me as a citizen is the message (which seems to be all over the place).

  3. Yeah, the message wasn’t exactly focused: some claimed it wasn’t anti-tax… but it was held on tax day, and so on, and so on. But really, they can craft message later. For a rally that’s just meant to drum up enthusiasm and such, its sort of energy that matters more than focus.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: